AMD’s internal tests with Enscape using a ‘mansion model’ put the W5700 in the lead, 5% faster. In Enscape 2.6, the architecture focused viz tool that has VR built in, we found the Radeon Pro W5700 was only 6% slower that the Quadro RTX 4000 when testing with a sizable museum model. Most Solidworks users will get nowhere near this complexity, so frame rates will be well in excess of 20 FPS for a very smooth modelling experience.įor VR, of course, every little bit of performance is critical as it could mean the difference between a silky-smooth experience and a nausea inducing flicker. In real world testing we managed to get a perfectly acceptable 17 frames per second (FPS) out of a colossal 60 million triangle MaunaKea Spectroscopic Explorer telescope model, the most complex Solidworks assembly we’ve ever seen. In Solidworks 2019, on the other hand, the 10-20% difference will likely mean nothing to the end user. And as we’re talking about automotive styling here, smoothing jagged lines is really important. In Autodesk VRED Professional 2020, for example, a powerful application for automotive visualisation, the Radeon Pro W5700 dropped off considerably when anti-aliasing was turned on. In some workflows this will make a significant difference to the end user experience. Performance figures shared by AMD show marginal gains of up to 7% compared to the Quadro RTX 4000, when tested in a range of CAD and viz focused applications and benchmarks, including Catia, Maya, Enscape and Unity.Īs you’d expect, AMD has hand-picked the ones it’s shared benchmark figures for, but our own tests, done at 4K resolution, all show it to be behind the Quadro RTX 4000 - marginally in some areas and more considerably in others. We don’t yet know how this will translate to the UK street price but it should be lower than both the Radeon Pro WX 8200 (currently £876 ex VAT on .uk) and the Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 (8GB) (currently £799 Ex VAT on .uk). With an SEP of US $799, AMD is going relatively hard on pricing. Even so, it still plays second fiddle to the 160W single height Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000, against which it is being pitched. But a new power efficient 7nm manufacturing process means it has a superior performance per watt over the GCN-based Radeon Pro WX 8200 (up to 41% higher, according to AMD). Rated at 205W and requiring a 6-pin and an 8-pin connector, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 is a power-hungry card. But it’s also its most powerful professional workstation GPU ever, outperforming the high-end Radeon Pro WX 9100 (16GB). In terms of positioning, AMD says the Radeon Pro W5700 is a follow on from the Radeon Pro WX 7100 (8GB) and WX 8200 (8GB), sitting somewhere between the two. AMD has changed its long-standing naming convention and its professional graphics cards will now be aligned with their consumer equivalents - in this case the AMD Radeon RX 5700 which launched this summer. It is being pitched as the ‘world’s first’ PCIe Gen 4 professional graphics card, which offers double the bandwidth of PCIe Gen 3.Īt first glance one might presume the Radeon Pro W5700 is a replacement for the 3D CAD-focused AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100, but it’s actually significantly more powerful. ![]() The double height board features 8GB GDDR6 memory, five Mini DisplayPorts, and one USB-C port for new generation VR headsets. It’s really designed for more demanding workflows, including real-time visualisation, virtual reality (VR) and GPU rendering. ![]() The AMD Radeon Pro W5700 is not simply for 3D CAD. Today AMD has launched the first professional GPU to be based on its new 7nm ‘Navi’ RDNA architecture, which will replace its ageing 14nm Graphics Core Next (GCN) design. While Nvidia has been untouchable at the high-end with the hugely powerful Quadro RTX 5000, 60 GPUs, AMD has concentrated more on price / performance with the entry-level, CAD-focused Radeon Pro WX 3200, also available for mobile workstations including the HP ZBook 14u and 15u G6.īut this is about to change. Over the last 12 months, AMD has been notably quiet in workstation graphics - certainly compared to Nvidia, who delivered its first Quadro RTX GPUs earlier this year, complete with dedicated ray tracing cores and the ambition of ‘real time’ ray tracing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |